CS'ler wieda...

[_-Psirus-_]

Ich find der kerl hats drauf

[Brother_Kerensky]

auszug aus einem comic

a bot game two bots talking "hey dont shoot i wnat to show you something!"

"ok what?"

"look here you see that ramp other there? "

"Yes"

"and the Health Vials on it ?"

"no plz dont tell me plz"

"Another DAvid M Map "

"NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!ARGH"

map even bots hate them


auf deutsch für diejenigen die zu faul sind oder kein englisch können

hey nich schiessen ich will dir was zeigen !

ok was den?

da siehst du die rampe ?

ja

und die vials drauf ?

ja oh nein sags nciht plz

doch eine neue DAVID M MAP !!1

NEIIIIIINNNNNN


Maps das sogar Bots sie hassen der is doch gut oda ?

[Madze]

Saugeil

[Brother_Kerensky]

heheh ich weis der is geil hab ich vom kumpel aba das is doch war oda auf der david m site gibts ein map maker im david m style der typ hat echt ein ego das grösser als das universum is und geht damit jedem aufn geist

DAVID M

[Madze]

Und dabei hat seine Seite grad mal 1,5 millionen hits

das ist aba wenig!

[pyro]

Also ich find eigendlich der geht so. Der hat schon recht damit. Ich find den Kerl lame! Wenn einer nach der Meinung eines Profis fragt, dann musser mit kritik rechnen...

Nur das Flash Banner auf seiner Site is echt zu viel des guten!!

Aber DM-1on1-Lego][ knallt!! Is nur langsam bei mir...

[Madze]

Was hat der Kerl immer mit seinem l33t? Was bedeutet der scheiß eigentlich?


Lest euch das mal durch:


Some thoughts about (map)-reviews.

1. Why do reviews have to be so friggin' long?
I only need to know what the gameplay style is....if its well done...whatever...
But all the reviews are 1 din A4 page long. Only the mapper and the reviewer will read it, as player I download the map and play it...thats faster than reading that stuff, isn't it?
So why not just write 3 or 4 sentences about a map and show 2 or 3 pics?


2. Why have shitty maps to be reviewed?
Reviewers write a 10 page review and the result is the map sucks ass.....oh great!!
I mean, when I watch the pics I already know if this is an ok-map or a shitty-map. If it looks utter crappy I wont bother downloading that thing and play it.....
Neither will I read it, I dont really want to know why the map sucks! But its interesting to know why a good map is good...
A pic tells me if it sucks or if its ok, it won't tell me if its l33t or ok. To find out if a map is l33t I need to play it against humans for some time.
And please dont tell me that the überugly map has a great gameplay. That never happened and it will never happen.
Someone who doesnt manage to get some ok visuals in a map will never make a great gameplay!


3. Why stupid scores?
Who needs % scores?
I need to know if its bad, ok, or l33t
Not if its 20%, 30% or whatever. I mean everything under 60% sucks....so no differentiation necessary there.
Same for 93% and 98%...this is a subjective thing, but it means its a l33t map.
OK would be from 70% to 89%

And what about retarded scores for music, sound, graphic, lighting, textures, gameplay, floorplan , bots blah blah blah....
a) textures, lighting, visuals, sound, music = they are all 1 and the same point.
I would call this point "Theme/Atmosphere"
How well is the theme made. No subscores necessary I think....

b) all other points are "Gameplay"
So just 2 Scores for Theme and Gameplay....no overal scores 0_o


4. WHY are so many reviewers so fucking stupid?
The biggest problem. Most reviewers should be killed immediately IMO.
The review shows an überugly pic and next to it a reviewer comment...."WOW, INCREDIBLE LOOKS"
I think they are just blind....:P
But probably it's more an attitude problem. People should not think "This map is good for an amateur" (not everybody can be an alan willard)
It doesn't matter who made it, ask yourself "would I pay for a game with such maps?"
Amateur maps must be compared to so called pro maps!
Most review sites sound like parody.....they only review shit maps, give them only very good scores....and when you read the review you have the feeling the reviewer is trying to make fun of the dumb community 0_o

And please no 'encourage scores'! Some reviewer....lets call him "KilledJoy" *cough* He is the master when it comes to that....
The whole review is like "this suck, that sucks, blah" and the final score is 90%....because that encourages the mapper according to him...
It's not about encouraging anyone because he made a shitty map!
Reviews are to suggest maps to players!
And a mapper doesnt have to be encouraged for a shitty map, his flaws must be pointed out so he can become better...
But dont give feedback in reviews. Do that on a msg board or by email. This shouldn't be a public thing, it doesnt belong in a review.
REVIEWERS, DIE DIE DIE DIE!!!
So if you have no skillz......become a reviewer
There is something else I wanted to write, but I forgot it.....whatever


I'm curious what you think about it....don't forget to tell me that I am ghey, arrogant, that I have to grow up, that I need to get a life....etc




Oh mein Gott ist der Kerl toll, es gibt keinen besseren als ihn, ich will so werden wie er, ich nenne alle meine Kinder David und wechsele meinen Nachnamen in Münnich.